All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
Meat: An Environment Killer MAG
We’ve all seen our share of scientists in white coats, explaining what global warming is, why it’s dangerous, and what we can do to stop it. We encounter protests against fossil fuels and auto emissions. But the one industry that produces more greenhouse gases than all the SUVs, cars, ships, planes, and trucks in the world combined, according to GoVeg.com, has carefully avoided this scrutiny. The meat industry is an often-overlooked factor in environmental destruction, existing unnoticed as a major source of deforestation, wasted natural resources, and pollution.
Rainforests hold a wealth of plant and animal life. Trees are natural air filters, pulling harmful carbon dioxide from the air and converting it to oxygen. The meat industry, particularly cattle ranching, kills millions of acres of rainforest each year.
Just one quarter-pound hamburger requires the clearing of six yards of rainforest and the destruction of 165 pounds of living matter, including 20 to 30 plant species, 100 insect species, and dozens of birds, mammals, and reptiles, according to ChooseVeg.com. Small amounts of beef in an individual’s diet soon add up and do great harm to the environment.
Cattle farming turns fertile land into barren desert, threatening or eliminating more plant species in the U.S. than any other cause. Livestock grazing can be a huge threat to endangered species and may contribute to extinctions.
There is no doubt that the meat industry causes immense, irreversible harm to the earth’s rainforests. But this is not the only victim of the meat industry. Meat consumption also produces a massive amount of waste.
Four hundred and forty-one gallons of water is required for each pound of cattle raised, compared to just 14 gallons to grow a pound of grain, according to ChooseVeg.com. Three days of a typical non-vegetarian diet requires as much water as the average person uses showering for an entire year. An individual can save more than 3,700 gallons of water per day by eating a plant-based diet. Ogallala, the largest aquifer in America, is depleted by 12 trillion gallons a year, mostly due to soaring meat production. Besides draining our water supply, meat production leads to food shortages as well.
World hunger is a severe problem, with millions of men, women, and children going hungry each day. Most people do not realize that not eating meat could relieve starvation worldwide. Meat production takes up 70 percent of the world’s agricultural land. A single acre of farmland can, over a year, produce 250 pounds of beef or 40,000 potatoes. Yet it is not only land usage that prevents food from getting to the people who need it most. Twenty percent of the world’s population (1.4 billion people) could be fed with the grain and soy beans currently consumed by U.S. cattle alone. By adopting a vegetarian diet, individuals could cut the amount of land used to produce their food by a magnitude of ten.
Another unpleasant side effect of meat production is the pollution it produces. Animal agriculture creates five tons of waste per person over a typical lifetime in the U.S., according to ChooseVeg.com. That’s 87,000 pounds of waste each second. Animal waste from factory farms seeps into groundwater, contaminating it. Chicken, hog, and cattle manure has polluted 35,000 miles of rivers in 22 states and contaminated water in 17 states. The EPA reports that pollution from livestock farming is a leading cause of water contamination in the U.S., killing marine life and making drinking water unsafe.
Meat production is also a major cause of global carbon dioxide and methane pollution. These greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere, contributing to global warming. Colossal amounts of fossil fuel are used to grow food for livestock, dispose of remains, and transport the meat. Cows are a major cause of methane pollution because their waste contains large amounts of the gas. In America, cattle have altered the environment more than all the highways, strip mines, dams, and power plants combined, according to ChooseVeg.com.
Producing a single pound of meat emits the same amount of greenhouse gases as driving an SUV 40 miles – 500 pounds of carbon dioxide for just a quarter-pound hamburger. Worldwide petroleum reserves would be exhausted in 11 years if the rest of the world started eating meat like the United States does. But if Americans skipped one meal of chicken per week and substituted a vegetarian meal instead, the carbon dioxide savings would be equivalent to taking more than half a million cars off U.S. roads (ChooseVeg.com)! Despite these undeniable statistics, some people defend eating meat and deny the impacts of an omnivorous diet on the environment.
There is no doubt that meat production harms the environment by contributing to deforestation, global warming, wasted resources, and pollution. The United Nations has said that going vegetarian is the greenest thing individuals can do to save the environment. The University of Chicago reports that going vegetarian is 50 percent more effective than switching to a hybrid car in reducing greenhouse emissions.
What did the great thinkers Aristotle, Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, Mohandas Gandhi, and John Lennon have in common? They were all vegetarians. But don’t worry, there is no need to swear off meat all at once! By simply reducing your meat consumption (especially beef) you can take steps to help save the environment and stop global warming. Cut down a little bit each week at a pace that suits you. Refrain from eating that hamburger – our earth will thank you for it!
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 241 comments.
People centuries ago had a greater respect for the environment and their food source. They killed what they needed for survival. There is no possible way for you to compare today's society to older times because of a) a massive increase in population b) practices c) technology of the time.
PS. I'm not ignorant to the fact that other animals kill other animals to survive. I am also aware that they don't hold their prey in holding pens, and then stun them, beat them over the head and slit their throats so that they will bleed out.
And again, i know the modern world is bad, or whatever. But technology is a big part of that. And, by the way, you can't "get the same stuff from plants". It's similar, but not the same.
And, of course, about those silly studies of yours. I googled it and found just as many studies, form all over the world, for vegetarianism as against. So that proves a fact that requires very basic amounts of logic; that studies can, and often will, be biased. Obviously a study from a website promoting vegetarianism is going to say it's healthiest!
As for the studies. They DO mean something and they will continue to mean something until you take the time to refute them with your own scientific facts. Until then, everything you've said is just nonsense and an uneducated opinion. Trust me, kid, I did extensive research before I became a vegetarian so that I knew exactly why and how I'd go about it.
and, as for those studies you mentioned, that is just biased and insignificant. I am sure that i could go online and find studies proving that eating meat is healthier. So that doesn't mean anything .
It's scientific fact that vegetarians live longer. Vegans have a longer life expectancy than vegetarians. They just have to be more careful that they make up for anything they are not eating that their bodies need. As for the balance of life....we messed that up a long time ago. Humans were originally built with a working appendix to cope with raw meat..but we've moved on from that. It's called evolution and advances in technology and knowledge have made the need of the brutal killing of animals, the housing them in horribly confined areas, the filth, the pollution, the need for the huge amount of resources to raise them, obsolete.
Crop land is not the same as pasture land. Pasture land is not sustainable enough to produce crops, only to raise livestock. We don't have enough sustainable crop land to support a world of vegeterians.
So while, yes, we do need to find away to reduce pollution from raising livestock and we could cut down on meat eating for both health and environmental reasons, everyone going fully vegeterian would make agriculture very unstainable and we would most likely have to cut down more rainforests (slash & burn agriculture) to keep even first world countries from starving to death.
Just a tip for the future, you only list one source in your piece, I would suggest looking up more sources to gain a less biased more well rounded opinion.
0 articles 0 photos 106 comments
Favorite Quote:
"If you can't stand behind our troops, feel free to stand in front of them."- a Bumper Sticker<br /> "If Obama was the answer, it was a stupid question." - Another Bumper sticker