Get Our
Print Magazine

48 pages of creative bliss. Written by teens for teens since 1989.
Subscribe!
See us on Facebook,
MySpace & Twitter
   
Home > All Opinion > For Love or Money?

For Love or Money? This piece has been published in Teen Ink's monthly print magazine.

Rate this article:
By Kaleigh L., Heath, TX
The popular television show “Eight Is Enough” aired in the late 1970s and fascinated viewers of all ages who followed the trials and tribulations of the Bradford brood, eight independent children headed by their father, Tom. In the last 30 years, doctors have created in vitro fertilization, a procedure for artificial impregnation, and as a result, the ­Gosselins, parents of a set of twins and sextuplets, became stars of TLC’s hit show “Jon & Kate Plus 8.”

The surge of reality
Photo credit: Anna H., Buckeye, AZ
shows, YouTube, and Facebook provides many with the ability to capture the eyes of the country and hear their name spoken around the world. However, parents should not seek stardom by having a large family, nor should they get a free pass in child rearing because they have more kids than most. The parents of this nation need to grow up, face the realities of parenthood, and assume the full ­responsibilities of child rearing.

When a couple wants to have a baby, they must consider whether that child will truly benefit from the life they can provide and whether they understand the responsibilities involved in raising a child. The recent case of Nadya ­Suleman, a mother of octuplets, shone a huge spotlight on the responsibility of parenting.

Unmarried, unemployed, and living in her mother’s home, she already had six children younger than eight, three of whom are disabled, and receives money from the state to care for them. When ­doctors announced that Suleman had given birth, through in vitro fertilization, to octuplets with pride and excitement – reporting that the delivery was “amazing” and the mom was “incredibly courageous” – the 46-member medical team expected praise and high-fives. Instead, jaws dropped and talk of her courage changed to questions about both her judgment and the doctors’, as well as the ethical concerns about fertility treatments.

Instead of the vital role of a father in their lives, these eight new babies have only a sperm donor. In addition, some publications reported that Suleman plans to use her fame to launch a tele­vision show. Though she denies claims that she is seeking fame, Suleman has employed a publicist and an agent. She says that all she wanted was babies, but one has to wonder if she was thinking of their need for comfort and love when she decided to have this many children.

In the United States, no one can dictate how many children families have. However, the country needs some sort of counseling, similar to the advice a ­doctor gives a patient who smokes three packs of cigarettes a day. They simply state the consequences of smoking before the damage appears and bluntly ask the patient to stop. If adults know that they will be ­incapable of or even unable to provide for the needs of children, then they should reconsider becoming parents.

In the case of Suleman and many others, the cost will be paid by the American taxpayer. Millions have been spent to care for her babies in the neonatal intensive care unit and supply her large family with diapers, blankets, and clothes. Realistically, Americans have a stake in the outcome, and we must not encourage a repetition of this by putting Suleman into the spotlight. Clearly, the necessary measures must be taken to ensure that parents’ reproductive rights – or media ambitions – do not come before their child’s right to a decent life.
This piece has been published in Teen Ink's monthly print magazine.This piece has also been published in Teen Ink's monthly print magazine.

Join the Discussion


This article has 22 comments. Post your own!

SMILEZ:) said...
Oct. 22 at 12:57 pm:

I dont think its right that people are having kids just cause they want fame
thats not right. i mean they can have all the babies they want but to love them not just cause fame WOW..

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Cleo said...
Aug. 17 at 5:25 pm:

wow, you make some really good points. i definitly agree, the only way it would be alright for that lady to have fourteen kids, is if she was actually able to care for them all. good job!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Lauren S. said...
Aug. 17 at 5:07 pm:

I agree with the opinion of this article. Regardless of your opinions on abortion, it wasn't like this woman was going through the course of a normal relationship and ended up having that many kids- she went out of her way to get pregnant using a sperm donor. She knows she doesn't have the resources to care for the kids the way they deserve to be cared for. She's looking for fame and fortune and to make something out of her life that until now she hasn't, or she's looking to fill ... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
tweedle dee said...
Aug. 17 at 12:47 pm:

i agree with Nicoooooooole. the gov. doesnt need to be sending money to people just because they wanted alot of kids. have however many kids you want, but make sure you can care for them before you do. we have plenty of friends with seven, eight, even ten kids, but they dont get money from the state or have a television show, and they're real families. people just need to be more responsible.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
yemi F. said...
Aug. 8 at 11:45 pm:

i think people should be able to have as many kids as they want.

 
fandangopink replied...
Oct. 12 at 8:29 pm :

Well yeah... but can they care for them? Will the child have a good life? It's not the government's responsibility to make sure kids are well taken care of. That's up to the parents.

 
SMILEZ:) replied...
Oct. 22 at 1:01 pm :

i agree the parents are the ones that are suppose to be taking care of their babies not the government.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Nicole U. said...
Aug. 1 at 2:44 am:

Agree , if she was given sperm from a donor, how did she get it ? the goverment SHOULD be keeping records of all this . Its wrong that everyday people that are struggling with there kids and money have to give money to people that selfishly have kids that they cant provide for.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Ari110 said...
Jul. 17 at 2:20 pm:

It's my opinion tht the government shouldn't pay for these children. There parents/parent need to get up and make money so they can support there family on there own. Also i think its wrong to get doners so you can have a child, would u want ur kid 2 grow up with out a father or mother?

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Aileen_Polanski said...
Jul. 14 at 2:30 am:

some people just don't know the meaning of stop. they need to learn it!

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
brookiemonsterx@gmail.com said...
Jun. 13 at 3:14 am:

I love this article! It's really interesting and it's a point of view I have yet to come across- until now that is. I think I now share your opinion! Good work :)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
chas said...
Jun. 6 at 2:23 am:

interesting topic, babies, kids, teens, young adults, everyone is a person that matters and thinks and is human. i think abortion is very wrong, unless there is a serious problem with the woman, the child is human, "a bunch of tissue" to a infant is wrong, would you call an adult that. "oh your just a bunch of tissue"? you don't realy matter. this is almost the same thing, it dosn't matter about the kids, they're just a bunch of tissue, its me, money , fame, all that jazz. i understa... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Jenna C. said...
Jun. 4 at 7:36 pm:

I agree! There are families out there that only have two or three kids that need money more than Kate. She had a perfectly good job as a nurse and she just threw it away. It's not fair that she gets all this money just because she has eight children.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
soac09 said...
Jun. 3 at 4:25 pm:

A little rough, but you express your opinion well and I agree.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Amirio F. said...
Jun. 2 at 9:51 pm:

I totally agree! It's really sad what people will do for fame.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
FRANKIEyo said...
May 20 at 3:01 am:

WOW!!! That is sooooo true. I hate the fact that so many people only have children to become famous

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
HOPEMVP said...
May 6 at 5:38 pm:

I think this article needs work, but great topic.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Cate56 said...
May 5 at 1:23 am:

Very well thought out article. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
i believe in dreams' said...
May 3 at 12:08 pm:

I agree with Meghan.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Chrissy L. said...
May 2 at 5:55 pm:

Well, there is a bit of a paradox to the ethics here. Even if the octuplets don't have every oppertunity we do, can you honestly say it would be better if they did not exist? If Nadia never got pregnant, those children would never be alive. Sometimes I wonder about that, if I were one of the octuplets, I would still want to have been born. The Gosselins were only trying for one child when they got sextuplets, if you found out you were pregnant with that many, would you just terminate a few of... (more »)

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Moon Sun said...
May 1 at 9:52 pm:

hilarious

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment
 
Meghan said...
May 1 at 1:24 am:

I agree. People shouldn't keep having babies if they need the state to help pay. I think these people would know when to stop. These people dont deserve to be in the spotlight and really shouldnt be.

 
Reply to this comment Post a new comment