All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
Not All Zoos Are Inhumane MAG
This piece is a response to “The Modern Zoo” from the May 2008 issue of Teen Ink. I volunteer at the Cleveland Metroparks Zoo and have gotten to know its keepers, veterinary staff, and other workers. According to the writer of “The Modern Zoo,” staff torture animals, do not provide adequate living space, and keep the animals merely to entertain. In my three years of volunteering, I have never seen, nor had any reason to suspect, any foul play at my zoo. The allegations in “The Modern Zoo” that all zoos are inhumane and cruel is false, I believe.
According to the article in Teen Ink, “Zoos claim to educate visitors. Yet we’ve all seen the one-sentence signs that describe monkeys. What can be learned from this? Certainly not enough to justify inhumane captivity.” One-sentence signs are not the end of zoos’ efforts to educate. At my zoo an entire department is devoted to educating the public about conservation of animals and our planet. If zoos didn’t care about education, why would they have this? While exhibits may display signs with brief information, staff work daily at the zoo to educate visitors about conservation and other critical topics.
Some zoo employees visit schools and businesses to educate the public about how to be more responsible with our environment. This department even organizes conservation projects around Ohio, such as the community effort to remove waste from Big Creek. Volunteers spent a day restoring the creek to a more healthy ecosystem. The zoo is also part of a national conservation campaign called Year of the Frog, dedicated to saving amphibian species from extinction. Zoos put forth tremendous effort to educate people, and to say that they do not is just not true in my experience.
“Zoo animals endure inadequate living conditions with no space,” claims the article. It’s not fair to make this generalization. My own zoo, for example, is planning a one-of-a-kind, spacious exhibit for its elephants. The exhibit encompasses many acres, and will be large enough to support a breeding population. If zoos didn’t care about adequate space for their animals, why would they waste time raising millions of dollars to build this type of exhibit? Also, my zoo cares a lot for its animals; it houses the second oldest hippo in North America and its polar bears are twice the age of those in the wild.
I witnessed a life-saving surgery on a 13-year-old wolf. Veterinarians worked for two hours to save his life. Thirteen is very old for a wolf. Zoos do care for their animals, and do what they can to keep them strong and healthy.
“These animals are simply meant to entertain,” claims “The Modern Zoo.” That too is false. At the Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, animals are never forced to do anything for the sake of visitors’ entertainment. We believe in positive animal/ human interaction. Zoo staff never force or coerce an animal due to this policy.
The author of “The Modern Zoo” is obviously very passionate in his opinion about zoos. I am also very passionate. I have not written this to personally attack him. Rather, I am simply stating facts. “The Modern Zoo” paints zoos as cruel, inhumane facilities, but it is both unfair and untrue to claim this about all of them. Many have state-of-the-art veterinary facilities and work hard to save endangered species.
I hope that readers will see that zoos seek to protect and save endangered species, as well as educate and encourage the public to do the same.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 80 comments.
grasslova, look up anarcho-primitivism, I think it might interest you. ;]
My opinion: Some people are cruel. Some of these people work at zoos. Some people care. They also work at zoos. Some zoos as a whole can be cruel, and some intend to be kind to the animals in their care.
I understand that, and so on physical level, zoos more often than not (as people are, more often that not kind as opposed to cruel) do not harm animals, and all levels, do not seek to harm animals.
However, I don't think this physical aspect should be argued along with the conceptual one. It confuses things.
I do believe that the concept of zoos is wrong. Keeping animals locked up is not right, true. I'm very against it.
However, the same can be said of the way we as humans live today (technology, large societies, etc), and whether living this way is harmful to us, going against our natures. Perhaps, but living just doesn't work on a philosophical plane, you live in the day to day world and all that REALLY matters in life is whether or not you are happy. And if you are, or you will be, does it really matter whether or not we are in tune with nature? (That's not an argument against improvement, but against completely destroying our current lifestyle in order to start again better. It's not urgent, change can happen gradually and there's no point and no benefit to getting worked up about it.)
I personally boycott zoos, not because I believe the workers in general (I know there are exceptions) treat the animals inhumanely, but because I disagree with the idea behind them. However, I will not go around making blanket statements about all people who work in zoos and going on long, misanthropic rants because a) it's not true and b) it just isn't going to help and c) because the animals often AREN'T harmed, it's not totally urgent that the change from having to not having zoos happens suddenly. It is apparent from studies that zoo-life is not beneficial to animals in a nonphysical, non-immediate survival way. Like the way we get depression when we are unstimulated and deprived of the sort of life we were born for.
It's coming to light just how smart, just how similar animals are to humans, and I ask, how do WE do in cages?
It's not happy. That's my argument.
But I'm against zoos, not zoo workers.
Not all zoos are bad, but some are, I guess that when you really look at it its party on how much money the zoo has.
I went to Disney World two years ago and was pleasantly surprised at how well the animals were treated. They had large enclosures (notice how I didn't say cages) and some of them were even able to interact with other animals.
I believe that people have come along way in how we treat their animals. In school I learned that the first elephant that came to America was given beer instead of water, since water was very valuable. Its good to know that we don't have drunk elephants running the zoos!
2 articles 0 photos 17 comments
Favorite Quote:
"other men said they have seen angels, but i have seen thee, and thou art enough"- g. moore