All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
The Science of Non-recprecated Love
He is nothing, nothing but matter that takes up space. So why then am I so drawn to him? Why do I wish to inhale everything he exhales, when he doesn't even care if I breath at all. Galileo could interpret the cosmos but I can't interpret the way he makes me makes me feel. All I have to say for my feelings is that they are so intense that all 206 bones in my body ache for him. But it seems that there was a big bang that I just missed, because he's moving away from me. His cerbrum can't conjecate the idea of him loving me. His endorphins can't produce happiness and excitement toward me. The circulation in his body doesn't pump blood faster whenever he sees me. I will never cause a rec shift in his universe, I am temory black hole that will just denigrate, into darkness. I just have to face the facts Robert Boyle created chemesty but there is just no chemesty between us. If he is nothing, I am less then nothing, beacsue he made me feel like I was something, something more then just matter.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 0 comments.