310 Million Too Many | Teen Ink

310 Million Too Many

November 16, 2014
By Molly Flanagan BRONZE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Molly Flanagan BRONZE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1 article 0 photos 3 comments

What’s it like to not feel safe in your own home? How does it feel to risk your life every time you go outside? Should anyone have to ask themselves this? In an unproblematic world, no, but that is not our reality. Guns make it hard to feel safe and that is a problem. The way of battling this issue will never be easy, but we should at least try to be optimistic. Guns need to be controlled because they are problematic, very harmful, and in the hands of many who should not have them.

Guns are very problematic. Since there are many more guns available than we actually need, they seem a bit unnecessary. As a matter of fact, “there are by various estimates anywhere from 270 million to 310 million guns in the United States — close to one firearm for every man, woman and child.” (Desilver). Why do we need so many guns? In actuality, we don’t. Many of our country and even the world’s problems are and have started with guns. Can’t we communicate our feelings in some way other than violence? We need to be educated. We stick to violence because we know it works. Our comfort zone must be expanded. Violence is only a short term problem solver, and guns help us with that. We need to consult, learn, and listen. No one is always right and that needs to be accepted. Acceptance is the key to communication, and with a little more acceptance, we will find success and safety.


The people of today are in great danger. Many argue that guns are crucial for self defense. Opponents of gun control argue that everyone needs a gun to protect themselves and their families. Not necessarily. If guns were used only for self defense, there wouldn’t be an issue. But, that’s not the case. Too many people, mentally stable or not, abuse the power of a gun, resulting in the deaths of innocent, everyday civilians.  Take the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary for example: “...on December 14, 2012, 26 people were shot and killed in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, including 20 children under the age of 10.” (“Gun Control Laws”). The amount of havoc that guns cause nowadays is disgusting. Innocent people are dying, and too many have already died.  The lives of the people of yesterday can’t be brought back, but it’s not too late to save the ones of the people of tomorrow.


Is America safe? Not according to it’s citizens. According to Americans, half of them feel less safe after the dreadful terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 (“Survey: Half of Americans Feel Unsafe”). After 9/11, the U.S. greatly improved its airport security to make sure nothing like that would ever happen again. Since then, there have been many tragedies involving gun violence. Why didn’t the government take drastic measures then? What are they waiting for? Like Australia, the United States should enact gun control laws. Even the smallest bit of success could make our country a safer place. For example, “after a mass shooting in 1996, Australia enacted a sweeping package of gun restrictions far more ambitious than anything plausible here -- including a total ban on semiautomatic weapons, a mandatory gun buyback, and strict limits on who could own a firearm. John Howard, who was prime minister at the time, wrote the other day that his country ‘is safer today as a consequence of gun control.’” (Chapman).


Various mass shootings have been done by people who are not mentally stable. For example, James Holmes, the infamous shooter in the theater of “The Dark Knight Rises”, who killed 12 people, was mentally ill (Healy). This is very dangerous because the minds of the mentally unstable are incredibly puzzling to us. The only one that knows what’s going on in their heads are themselves, and when a gun is placed in the hands of the mentally ill, or anyone for that matter, who knows what they will end up using it for? To make our country a safer place, we need deeper background checks. A more accurate background check can prevent some soon-to-be criminals, including the mentally unstable, from harming others or themselves.


Some may argue that guns are not the issue, but people are. Both of them deserve to be blamed. A gun and its person work hand in hand, literally, to do the damage. “...the NRA says, ‘Guns don’t kill people — people kill people,’” (Chasmar). Ultimately it is the gun whose bullets hit the target and harm the subject, but who shoots the bullets? Sure, the gun still shoots the bullets, but the gun can not decide for itself that or what it wants to shoot. The gun doesn’t think or have a brain. The gun doesn’t know it’s powers are being abused. That’s where the human comes in. The human acts as the gun’s brain and it’s the gun’s brain that decides what to use it and when to use it for.


The Second Amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (U.S. Const. am. 2). This allows Americans to own guns. However, what we have now is not a “well regulated militia”, and our situation now is definitely not what the original authors of this amendment were hoping for. We have mass murders, suicides, killings, and assassinations. So why don’t we amend the amendment? Obviously this amendment is not doing our country justice. If our people are being killed due to this amendment that is supposedly making our country safer, then why bother? We need to fix this amendment favoring the safety of the people of America. Our “well regulated militia” consists of criminals.


Guns are a danger to this country. They need to be controlled because they are unnecessary and problematic, harmful, and in the hands of many who should not have them. It may take a while to fully address and fix this issue because it is widely debated and I believe that we will not find an agreement until many open their minds and accept other arguments. Maybe we can find a similarity and work from there. But for now, we need to take actions as soon as possible. The difference may not be huge, but a little goes a long way. And if even only one life is saved due to slight controlling, that means it’s a success.


Works Cited
"A Minority of Americans Own Guns, but Just How Many Is Unclear." Pew Research Center RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Oct. 2014.

Chasmar, Jessica. "Michael Moore: ‘Guns Don’t Kill People - Americans Kill People’." Washington Times. The Washington Times, n.d. Web. 26 Oct. 2014.
Healy, Jack. "Mental Evaluations Endorse Insanity Plea in Colorado Shootings, Defense Says." The New York Times. The New York Times, 13 May 2013. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.
"Second Amendment - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw." Findlaw. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Oct. 2014.
"Survey: Half of Americans Feel Unsafe." - American City & County Article. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.
"USA Gun Violence Statistics." Heedinggodscall.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Oct. 2014.


The author's comments:

I wrote this piece for my english class. I hope people will open their minds to my opinion on gun control in America, and give me feedback.


Similar Articles

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

This article has 15 comments.


on Mar. 16 2016 at 11:15 pm
runandgo BRONZE, Havertown, Pennsylvania
2 articles 0 photos 11 comments

Favorite Quote:
sometimes you get run down. sometimes life throws dirt in your eyes and it stings and you can't see for a few minutes. even after you get it out your eyes are all red and your vision is s***ty... but eventually, whether through tears or maybe just time... you start to see even clearer than before. life is not always good. which is why music exists. why i believe God exists. and why there's always a pint of coconut milk ice cream in my freezer.

this is a really well-written piece and i love what you have to say! surprised to see that no one else agrees. it's also disconcerting to see so many people talking down to you in the comments just because you expressed your opinion. this article says a lot of important things in very easy-to-understand language!

on Oct. 7 2015 at 8:31 pm
Glorious_Liberty BRONZE, Avon, Connecticut
3 articles 0 photos 7 comments
Sorry Molly but you are demonstrating some very scary views by trying to strip the public of their constitutional right which was given to us by the Patriots who gave their lives fighting for the very thing that you want to take away. Maybe America isn't the right country for you. Not hateful at all, just honest.

on Oct. 7 2015 at 8:28 pm
Glorious_Liberty BRONZE, Avon, Connecticut
3 articles 0 photos 7 comments
Absolutely correct

meels2000 said...
on Dec. 1 2014 at 6:29 pm
Teebonicus you know what you need to do... write your own article! There is no need for you to mess with this young lady, this is an oppinonated article; so a lot of people aren't going to agree. The author obviously didn't intend for a debate on her article, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Maybe if you weren't such a smart alec you could come up with the idea of officially sharing your opinion. If you're not then I'm going to have to politly ask you to stop rudely commenting on this beatiful piece of work. 

teebonicus said...
on Nov. 30 2014 at 10:26 am
Molly, my post was not an 'argument', it was a comment.   And, in a forum open to public comment, you have a right to be 'offended', but you don't have a right to silence opposing opinion.

on Nov. 29 2014 at 6:29 pm
Molly Flanagan BRONZE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1 article 0 photos 3 comments
I'm going to ask you politely not to comment on my essay again. I'm not going to argue my opinion with you. What you said has offended me, because just saying 'no offense' does not mean your words are not offensive. Yes, the format provides for comment, but not argument. 

on Nov. 29 2014 at 6:11 pm
Molly Flanagan BRONZE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1 article 0 photos 3 comments
I'm going to ask you politely not to comment again on my essay. I'm not going to argue my opinion with you. What you have said has offended me, because even saying 'no offense' does not ensure that it will not be offensive.

teebonicus said...
on Nov. 28 2014 at 12:33 pm
The format provides for comment. I made mine. If you refuse to tolerate that, it exposes liberal 'tolerance' and 'diversity' nicely.   And, Molly, no offense, but it's apparent that you have not the slightest understanding of what constitutes a right as opposed to a privilege.

on Nov. 28 2014 at 4:32 am
Molly Flanagan BRONZE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1 article 0 photos 3 comments
It doesn't matter if you care whether I approve or not, this is my piece and my opinion on the topic. If you feel so strongly against my opinion, that I'm entitled to, then you should write your own essay about it.

Dale said...
on Nov. 25 2014 at 5:19 pm
Molly, The homicide rate in the U.S. hasn't been this low since 1957.  Meanwhile the number of guns sold in the U.S. has been at all time highs the last few years and concealled carry is now allowed in some way in every state in the country.  Your premise is demonstably false.

FrankInFL said...
on Nov. 25 2014 at 3:07 pm
What if banning guns caused more deaths?   I ask this because it is estimated that (at a minimum) 80,000 violent crimes are prevented each year by someone who was legally armed.  This estimate was by a Harvard researcher whose goal was to make a case for banning private firearms.  At the other end, estimates range as high as 2.5 million violent crimes prevented.  In the middle, the US Dept of Justice estimated (c.1993) 800,000 violent crimes prevented by private firearms.

Even at the low end, these numbers dwarf the annual gun-death rate, so it's worth asking whether banning private firearms is such a good idea.   And if it were somehow possible to magically remove all firearms from everyone everywhere, this would put the weak, the old, the infirm, and the few at the mercy of the strong, the young, the healthy, and the pack.   Is that really what you intend?

RLemerysgt said...
on Nov. 25 2014 at 3:02 pm
You should sue the school for failure to teach you to think for yourself, but you will make a very good drone, saying and doing what ever your master tells you to!

Rifleman said...
on Nov. 25 2014 at 2:38 pm
More nonsense from an uninformed liberal that attempts to express his uneducated opinion.  We the people have a right and do not have to have a need.  Run along now.

Hopnchop said...
on Nov. 25 2014 at 1:42 pm
Nothing in the Constitution is a bill of needs, its the Bill of Rights. 

teebonicus said...
on Nov. 25 2014 at 12:43 pm
Listen, and listen well. I have a right to keep and bear arms for self-defense and defense of my liberty.   I could care less if you approve or not.